Welcome to the Analyst Blog — where you get all the latest news and perspectives for your industry. Read, comment and rate posts written by our analysts. And be sure to subscribe (by clicking on the e-mail icon in the upper right hand corner), so you can keep up with new content and comments easily.

On June 9, 2010, the $1.3 billion acquisition of Eclipsys Corporation by Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was announced. Eclipsys is a vendor of primarily inpatient, but also ambulatory EMRs, while Allscripts has focused on the ambulatory market exclusively. In thinking about the upcoming merger, the ambulatory EMR picture just sounded really confusing. While we published a Perspective report last week covering what we feel will be the implications of the merger for hospitals and practices using Eclipsys and Allscripts products, we found that listing and counting the ambulatory EMRs started to make the picture (and the potential issues for end users) a little clearer.

To demonstrate meaningful use of electronic health records and thus qualify for incentive payments under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), healthcare organizations will have to invest in health information exchange (HIE) technologies. David Blumenthal, M.D., National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, has made it very clear that information should follow the patient "across the enterprise and among competing entities." The HIE market is characterized by a number of suppliers offering a wide variety of technologies and strategies to exchange health information including integration platforms, data aggregation, physician portals, and composite applications. There is a not a one-size-fits-all solution.

On March 31, 2010, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) published a rule change that will pave the way for widespread provider adoption of e-prescribing. The new Interim Final Rule removes one of the major obstacles to e-prescribing -- the need to maintain a paper process for the estimated 11-13% of prescriptions written for controlled substances. This restriction has long served as a deterrent for adopters, despite the clear advantages of e-prescribing. It has been almost two years since the DEA published the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and the new rule still contains a complex two-factor authentication requirement for e-prescribers, but is expected nonetheless to improve adoption of e-prescribing.

Last week most of our healthcare team, including me, Lynne Dunbrack and Janice Young, headed to Atlanta for the HIMSS 2010 event. The change in energy at the event from 2009 was apparent from the moment we arrived. While the atmosphere at HIMSS 2009 was laced with cautious optimism as providers examined the HIT provisions of the recently-published American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, it was clear in the first hours of HIMSS 2010 that the pace had shifted and action and investment were underway.

With the passing of the HITECH Act in February of 2009, providers gained an unprecedented opportunity to receive incentive payments for implementing and using eligible electronic medical records (EMRs) under the conditions laid out in the law. In order to take advantage of the subsidies, providers must implement and demonstrate meaningful use of the EMR technology by specific deadlines, beginning in 2010. This incentive is driving interest in EMRs in all types of ambulatory practices.

Achieving “meaningful use” is the new holy grail in the realm of electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs). The HIT Policy Committee convened last Friday to hear from the various workgroups and receive an update from the HIT Standards Committee. The Meaningful Use Workgroup did not recommend any changes to the second draft of its Meaningful Use Matrix, which was presented at the last HIT Policy Committee meeting on July 16, 2009. The Workgroup did present a timeline for its activities over the next 12 months. Notable among the activities is that an assessment of the industry’s preparedness for meeting the 2011 objectives will not take place until Q410. It would seem, especially when one considers the low adoption rates of EMRs, EHRs, computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and health information exchange (HIE) technologies, that such an evaluation should have taken place before the Meaningful Use Matrix was developed. A case in point is the aggressive timeline for 100% use of CPOE.

Last Friday, August 14, 2009, the HIT Policy Committee met and adopted additional recommendations for its definition of meaningful use, a key requirement U.S. providers must demonstrate to access stimulus funding for investment in electronic medical records (EMRs). Friday's HIT Policy Committee publications included an update from the Meaningful Use Workgroup, a presentation from the Health Information Exchange Workgroup and a Review of Initial Recommendations by the Certification and Adoption Workgroup. All of the proceedings can be accessed from the HIT Policy Committee's webpage.

On June 16, 2009, the Health IT Policy Committee published a draft description of the definition of meaningful use of EMRs by provider organizations. The published materials included a presentation, a preamble document, and a matrix summarizing the priorities, goals, objectives and measures for meaningful use. Health Industry Insights expects to provide analysis in this community forum in the upcoming days, with more to come in our reports and publications. The deadline for public comments on the definition to the Health IT Policy Committee is June 26, 2009.

For hospitals to maximize their incentives payments, especially those that have not begun to invest in the requisite healthcare information technology (HIT), they must act swiftly. After all they can begin qualifying as soon as October 1, 2010. But there are so many looming issues – "What does meaningful use mean?", "Who will be the certifying body?" – not the least of which is the economic crisis thwarting HIT investment in advance of the incentive payments to come in the new few years.

EMR applications automate vast amounts of mission-critical functionality in the provider setting. With over 100 vendors to choose from and looming deadlines for implementation and demonstrating meaningful use to receive stimulus payments, inpatient and ambulatory facilities are faced with difficult decisions. For this reason, Health Industry Insights is beginning its 2nd annual EMR/EHR Short List research program. The Short List is designed to offer providers selection tools that differentiate vendor-supplied EMRs on the basis of customizable characteristics that are critical to their organizations. In order to create the Short Lists, I have been speaking with providers in the trenches in order to present the hard facts on their EMR decisions, the day-to-day issues they face and the best practices they're using.

On May 4, 2009, just days after the April 22, 2009, declaration of a public health emergency in the U.S., Eclipsys released an influenza A H1N1 (swine flu) outcomes toolkit that is designed to help hospitals using its electronic medical record (EMR) limit the spread of influenza in hospital waiting areas. Toolkits like the H1N1 toolkit introduced by Eclipsys provide an example of the potential for EMRs to provide decision support for providers faced with a rapidly-changing care environment. This toolkit provides an example of how EMRs can help providers to offer appropriate, timely treatment that conforms with best practices, even in the face of a public health emergency like the H1N1 outbreak.

On Tuesday, February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), which provides about $20 billion in funding for healthcare IT, including incentive payments to physicians who implement and use eligible electronic medical records under the conditions laid out in the law. The payments are conditional upon implementing an "eligible" product, and demonstrating "meaningful use" of EMRs. However, the definition of meaningful use provided in the bill is far from specific, and many questions remain to be answered. Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services announced it will offer guidelines on meaningful use for hospitals and practices.

eClinicalWorks, Dell and Wal-Mart are all leaders on price and value, and this shared interest has led them to collaborate on a new bundled product offering that will make electronic medical records available to members of Wal-Mart's Sam's Club. The new partnership will bundle eClinicalWorks' unified application, which combines an electronic medical record (EMR) and practice management system, with Dell hardware to be marketed on Sam's Club's Web site. Sam's Club claims to have 200,000 practices among its members, amounting to access to almost 65% of the available market for ambulatory EMRs, based on an estimated 308,900 office-based practitioners in the U.S. in 2006, according to the CDC's April 2008 publication of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).

Healthcare IT (HIT) terminology is confusing, even for experts as numerous similar and confusing terms are used to describe instances of HIT. The terms electronic health record (EHR) and electronic medical record (EMR) are commonly used interchangeably, but they are not synonymous.
In a recent report, Health Industry Insights (HII) established the definitions of these terms that we will use in our research, and compared these definitions with those of other respected industry sources including those published in April 2008 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)'s Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONCHIT). Our definitions emphasize the similarities in their solution components, while differentiating them on the basis of their interaction with other entities in the surrounding health IT environment.

On Tuesday, February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), which provides about $20 billion in funding for healthcare IT, including incentive payments to physicians who implement and use eligible electronic medical records under the conditions laid out in the law.