
By now, you've probably noticed that IDC does surveys in a big way. All that survey work means that I pay close attention to surveys produced by other companies. I read through the results with a healthy dose of skepticism, but recently I've found two very interesting ones related to sustainability - one from Ceres and another from Brighter Planet.

The pace and complexity of change the automotive industry is facing is staggering. If we look ahead 10 or 20 years, how many times will the product need to change? Joe Barkai and I have taken a look at just a few of the high profile announcements we've seen over the last couple months - from recent auto shows, investments in new technologies, and even the relationship between the industry's products and regulations, voluntary or involuntary. A common theme runs through many of these announcements - sustainability.
For the auto industry, sustainability isn't just about one issue or one product. It's about addressing a combination of environmental, social, and economic issues, such as customer expectations, government regulations, and financial pressures, all at the same time; knowing the risks and opportunities across every aspect of the business and across the lifecycle of every product is crucial.

Last week I received an email from one of the top PLM vendors with this question: "could PLM have prevented the recent recall of Toyota cars?" Earlier today, I was interviewed by a top-tier business magazine, and, perhaps not surprisingly, one of the questions was: "why wasn’t simulation able to predict the increased friction in the accelerator pedal mechanism and prevent the failure?"
My response to both was that no, I did not think that PLM could have prevented the failure altogether. It is my opinion, however, that when used effectively, PLM can reduce the likelihood of failures, expedite root-cause analysis, and the formulation of remedial steps. In the case of a recall, PLM, combined with other tools, can reduce the number of recalled cars, thereby reducing costs and damage to the brand image.
Before I discuss the rational behind my responses, I am interested to hear your opinions whether PLM could have / should have prevented this or similar product failures.
See more on this recall here http://idc-insights-community.com/posts/073f490f43

The recall of 2.3 million Toyota vehicles last week to correct an unintended acceleration caused by a sticky accelerator pedal is another blow to the company's nearly unblemished reputation. Only a few months ago, Toyota recalled 4.3 million vehicles for similar concerns, blaming floor mats lodged under the accelerator pedal as the root of the problem.
In typical fashion of humility and responsibility, Toyota president Akio Toyoda apologized to customers and halted the sales and production of eight Toyota models. With annual production of roughly 6.3 million vehicles and sales of nearly 10 million units worldwide, Mr. Toyoda's action is significant. Certainly, Toyota has deep pockets and can surely survive the loss of revenue. Nevertheless, recovering from the damage to its legendary quality image will be difficult and prolonged. Indeed, last week, Toyota's stock was down 16.7% and Consumer Reports removed Toyota from its recommended vehicle list.
The impact is felt beyond the Toyota name plate. Pontiac Vibe, which is built on the same platform as the Toyota Matrix, is also subject to the recall.

In our Supply Chain Top 10 Predictions for 2010, we talk a lot about manufacturing companies fundamentally shifting their supply chain structure from a fixed-cost-driven network to a variable-cost-driven one. Certainly, in many segments some form of this has been going on for years, but it is our view that the uncertainty around global economic recovery (what is the ‘new normal’?) will speed the trend considerably.
One pretty clear implication of moving from fixed to variable cost structures is the changing pace of outsourcing. Indeed in one of our 2010 predictions we suggest: The Increasing Pace of Supply Chain Outsourcing/Off-shoring Will Keep Risk Management High on the Strategic Agenda, But Investment Will Remain Focused on Building Risk Awareness.

We just published our report on supply network optimization – "Best Practices: Supply Network Optimization in Asset-Oriented Value Chains (AOVC)" (MI220746). Our research was geared toward asset-oriented manufacturers (those with significant asset investments, primarily chemicals, metals, and pulp and paper), because we believe complexity in this segment's greater supply chain, including production, can be well served by supply network optimization (SNO). Optimization tools will play a significant role in 2010 as global economies slowly recover and companies look to survive and to position themselves for the inevitable recovery. Most of the use cases for SNO tools among the AOVC also apply to many types of manufacturers.

The Auto ID and Sensing Expo, held at MIT and produced by the Cambridge Enterprise Forum, offered a preview of what's ahead for auto-ID and related sensor-based technologies. In years past, this event was focused on UHF-RFID. This year's event was expanded to include technologies ranging from automotive telematics to specialized RFID-data-acquisition systems designed for vertical industries. It reasons that the driving force behind RFID-related technologies has moved from third-party commercial-and-federal mandate to need-based functionality defined along vertical-market requirements.

I was recently interviewed on M2M Radio. This interview was conducted by M2M Magazine editor Peggy Smedley. Peggy and I discussed factors shaping the M2M market; topics covered ranged from the Manufacturing Insights M2M vendor selection framework to the manner by which the overall M2M ecosystem might benefit from the US Federal Government's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
| type | name | rating | Number of Comments | Number of Views | author | activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question | Is there a future for smarter manufacturing? | 0 | 588 | Miriam Kutcher | 07/21/09 | |
| Question | How do you mitigate risk with suppliers when their companies... | 0 | 732 | Miriam Kutcher | 07/21/09 | |
| Question | Is the "reset" economy just a normal business... | 0 | 561 | Miriam Kutcher | 07/21/09 |
New to our Community? Here's how to participate:
1. Join Now
It's free! Community members have access to research and tools and the ability to participate in discussions. Members can also network with their peers and industry analysts.
2. Access Leading ManufacturingTech Resources
Community members have access to ManufacturingTech research and tools. Not a member? Join now.
3. Read the Latest ManufacturingTech Blogs
Do you agree with our analysts? Share your comments & insights as a member (see #1).
Almost all of the content in this Community is visible to the public. However, if you want to access research materials and tools, contribute content, comment, or network with your peers -- you first need to join.